Diagnostic method of use of OMP26 antigen from Haemophilus influenzae

ABSTRACT

A novel antigenic protein derived from the outer membrane of  H. influenzae  is provided. DNA sequences encoding such a protein are also provided as are vaccines comprising the protein and methods of immunising a subject against  H. influenzae  infection. The invention also includes methods for the prophylaxis or treatment of rerspiratory tract infections or otitis media, as well as methods for the detection of  H. influenzae,  and kits for use in such methods.

This application is a divisional application of application Ser. No. 08/996,408 filed Dec. 22, 1997 which is a continuation of PCT/GB96/01549 filed Jun. 27, 1996 which claims priority benefits of GB9513074.6 filed Jun. 27, 1995.

The present invention relates to a novel antigen of Haemophilus influenzae, vaccines comprising it and its use in therapy and diagnosis.

H. influenzae is a Gram-negative aerobic heterotrophic bacteria with the form of rods (Krieg and Holt (ed), Bergey's Manual of Systemic Bacteriology, pp 563 (1984). It is a pathogen in acute respiratory infections and is also found in patients with chronic bronchitis and otitis media.

We have now identified, and purified, a unique 26 kDa outer membrane protein (called OMP26) from NTHI, and have surprisingly found that this protein can, when used as an immunogen, induce protective immune responses against infection with homologous and heterologous strains of NTHi. This protein has a molecular mass on SDS-PAGE similar to P5, but has been found to be distinctly different from the protein.

The outer membrane protein P5 is one of two lower molecular mass bands on SDS-PAGE gels used to subtype H.influenzae strains, and has an apparent molecular mass of 25-27 kDa. the P5 protein is heat-modifiable, demonstrating an apparent mass of 35 kDa after heating for 30 min at 100° C. in the presence of β-mercaptoethanol. Recently, another protein expressed by NTHi, called a fimbrin protein, has been characterised and shown to have similar molecular mass properties, heat modifiability and a 92% sequence homology to the previously described P5. The protein, OMP26, does not demonstrate either sequence homology or heat-modifiable characteristics as defined for either P5 or the fimbrin protein.

Thus, in a first aspect, the present invention provides a protein having a molecular weight of 26 kDa, as determined by SDS-PAGE, which protein is an outer membrane protein of H. influenzae. This protein is designated OMP26.

In particular, the protein of the invention has the amino acid sequence shown in FIG. 1, or one substantially homologous thereto. In a separate embodiment, the protein of the invention has the amino acid sequence shown in FIG. 1 commencing from amino acid no. 24, or one substantially homologous thereto. The first 23 amino acids constitute a “signal” sequence and it will be appreciated that a protein minus this sequence will be equally applicable. The protein of the invention is an immunogen and is thus capable of inducing an immune response which will protect against infection with H. influenzae.

In the context of the present invention proteins which are “substantially homologous” to OMP26 may be 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95% or even 99% homologous. Preferably, the protein will be at least 70% homologous, more preferably 80% homologous, even more preferably 90% homologous and most preferably 95% homologous. The skilled man will appreciate that the percentage degree of homology is one factor only. What is important is that the protein retains its antigenic effect. Thus, it is reasonable to have a protein having a relatively low degree of homology, for instance 40%, while retaining the antigenic activity discussed herein.

In addition, it is known in the art that “conservative” or indeed “semi-conservative” changes can be made to the amino acid sequence of a protein which will not alter its fundamental activity. For example, amino acids such as glycine, valine, leucine and isoleucine, which all have aliphatic side chains, may often be substituted for each other without substantially altering the biological activity of the protein. Similarly, amino acids such as phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan, which all have aromatic side chains, may be substituted for each other. Such proteins which retain the antigenic effect described herein are within the scope of the present invention.

It is also possible that antigenic parts or regions of OMP26 can be employed to induce the protective effect against H. influenzae. Such antigenic parts or regions are also within the scope of the present invention.

In a second aspect, the present invention provides a nucleic acid sequence, preferably DNA, which codes for a protein of the invention, variants thereof as described above or indeed antigenic parts or regions. In particular, the invention provides a DNA sequence as shown in FIG. 1 which codes for OMP26. The skilled man will appreciate that due to the degeneracy of the genetic code it is possible to make conservative changes to the DNA sequence which will not result in changes to the amino acid sequence of the protein. Thus, such DNA sequences are also within the scope of the present invention. Suitably, nucleic acid of the invention can form part of a vector such as a plasmid.

As discussed herein, the proteins of the invention stimulate an immune response against H.influenzae and thus, in a third aspect, the present invention provides a vaccine formulation comprising a protein of the invention, as defined herein, optionally together with one or more carriers and/or adjuvants.

In a fourth aspect, the invention provides the use of the protein of the invention, as defined herein, in the preparation of a vaccine against H. influenzae.

The vaccine composition of the invention can be used to immunize a subject against H. influenzae infection. Therefore, the invention provides, in a fifth aspect, a method of immunizing a subject against infection by H. influenzae, which comprises administering to the subject a vaccine composition of the invention. The vaccine compositions of the invention can be used to produce both systemic immunity and/or mucosal immunity.

In a sixth aspect, the present invention provides a method for the prophylaxis or treatment of respiratory tract infections or otitis media which comprises the step of administering to a subject a vaccine composition of the invention.

In other aspects the invention provides:

(a) The use of a protein of the invention, as defined herein, in the diagnosis of H. influenzae infection; and

(b) A kit for use in the diagnosis of H. influenzae infection comprising a protein of the invention, as defined herein.

Preferred features of each aspect of the invention are equally preferred for each other aspect mutatis mutandis.

The invention will now be described with reference to the following examples, which should not be construed as in any way limiting the invention.

The examples refer to the figures in which:

FIG. 1: shows the DNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) coding for OMP26 and the amino acid sequence (SEQ ID NO: 2) derived from that DNA sequence;

FIG. 2: shows SDS-PAGE analysis of OMP26 and two other proteins with higher molecular mass;

FIG. 3: (A) shows the N-terminal sequence (SEQ ID NO: 3) of the first 25 amino acids residues of OMP26 and (B) also a comparison of this with proteins from P. multocida (SEQ ID NO: 4) and Y. pseudotuberculosis (SEQ ID NO: 5);

FIG. 4: shows NTHI-I bacteria recovered in bronchial washings 4 hr post-challenge with live bacteria;

FIG. 5: shows OMP26-specific levels of IgG subclasses in serum of rats immunized with OMP26;

FIG. 6: shows an Immunoblot for the detection of OMP26-specific antibody in serum; and

FIG. 7: shows Antigen-specific proliferation of lymphocytes isolated from the MLN of OMP26 immunized and non-immune rats.

In the following example, the data have been expressed as the means +/− standard errors of the means. The pulmonary clearance data, total numbers of phagocytic cells, and differential cell count data were compared for statistical significance between groups by one-way analysis of variance, followed by Tuckey's test for multiple-comparison analysis (Macintosh Systat). Antibody data was assessed for between group significance by an unpaired t-test, and lymphocyte proliferation data assessed by a fully factorial analysis of variance (Macintosh Systat). Linear correlation between two variables was determined using the Pearson correlation coefficient (Macintosh Systat).

EXAMPLE 1

(i) Protein Purification

A 26 kDa protein (OMP26) was purified from strain NTHI-I by preparative electrophoresis. Bacteria from overnight culture of 100 agar plates were harvested by scraping the plates, and washed twice by centrifugation at 10,000×g for 10 min at 4° C. A crude outer membrane preparation was obtained by extraction of the outer membrane component with buffered Zwittergent 3-14 detergent and ethanol precipitation. The outer membrane extract was lyophilised, resuspended in a minimal amount of distilled water and further dissolved in 4 times the volume of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) reducing buffer (62.5 mM Tris, [pH 6.8], 10% [vol/vol] glycerol, 2% [wt/vol] SDS, 5% [vol/vol] β-mercaptoethanol, 1.2×10⁻³% [wt/vol] bromopheno blue). The SDS-preparation was incubated at 37° C. for at least 30 min prior to being located onto the stacking gel of the electrophoresis column. OMP26 was purified using preparative polyacrylamide electrophoresis (PAGE). Preparative SDS-PAGE to purify OMP26 was performed using the Bio-Rad Model 491 Prep Cell using a 60 ml 14 T-1.42% C acrylamide/BIS (N,N′-methylene-bis acrylamide) separating gel with a 10 ml 4% T-0.36% C acrylamide/BIS stacking gel polymerised in a 37 mm (internal diameter [i.d.]) column. Fractions eluted from the column were concentrated by lyophilisation, and analysed for protein content by analytical SDS-PAGE. OMP26, isolated using these conditions, contained SDS which was subsequently removed by potassium phosphate and precipitation. Fractions containing OMP26 were pooled and dialysed prior to determination of protein concentration.

Analytical identification of the protein was performed by analytical SDS-PAGE using either gradient 10-15% or homogenous 12.5% acrylamide gels, and silver stained. Protein concentration was determined using the Pierce micro BCA assay. The presence of LOS was assessed by both silver staining of SDS-PAGE mini-gels and assaying with the E-TOXATE Limulus lysate test.

Results

OMP26 was successfully separated from a group of three proteins with molecular masses between 26 and 30 kDa. FIG. 2 shows the position of this protein in relation to the other two, and the silver stained gel indicates the high degree of purity of the resulting preparation. Assessment of the heat-modifiable characteristic of this protein was performed by heating the protein sample at 100° C. for 30 min in the presence of β-mercaptoethanol. It was found that after 30 min the boiled protein sample still migrated with the same molecular mass (FIG. 2). To determine whether one of the other neighbouring protein bands may have been the heat-modifiable P5, all three proteins within this mass range were boiled for 30 min in the presence of β-mercaptomethanol, with none of the proteins demonstrating heat-modifiable characteristics (FIG. 2). Assessment of the protein for the presence of LOS contamination was performed using the E-TOXATE assay kit and found to be less than 0.6 μg endotoxin per mg protein.

(ii) Preparation of OMP26 for N-terminal Amino Acid Sequencing

OMP26 was prepared for N-terminal amino acid sequence analysis by transferring the protein band from an SDS-PAGE gel to PVDF membrane. This protein sample was sent to Cortecs Diagnostic, Techbase 1, Newtech Square, Deeside, Clwyd, United Kingdom, for sequence analysis.

Amino Acid Sequence Identification

An N-terminal amino acid sequence was obtained from the protein band transferred to PVDF. Amino acid sequence analysis for the first twenty-five peptides is shown in FIG. 3. The sequence analysis indicates no sequence homology with the N-terminal sequence of either Hib P5 or the fimbrin protein. The N-terminal amino acid sequence did show a 56% homology with a 21.4 kDa protein from Pasteurella multocida and a 44% sequence homology with a 19 kDa outer membrane protein from Yersinia pseudotuberculosis.

(iii) Immunisation and Bacterial Challenge

Specific pathogen-free male rats received an intra-Peyer's patch (IPP) immunisation on day 1, an intra-tracheal (IT) boost on day 14, and the final live bacterial challenge on day 21. The animals were sedated with halothane to facilitate intravenous anaesthesia with chloral hydrate via the tail vein. The small intestine was exposed through a mid-line abdominal incision and the antigen injected subserosal to each Peyer's patch using a 27-guage needle. The immunization protein (OMP26) was prepared by emulsification of 200 or 800 μg of protein per ml in a 1:1 ratio of Incomplete Freund's adjuvant (IFA) and phosphate buffered saline (PBS), and a total inoculum of 10 or 40 μg protein respectively was administered to each animal. Two control groups of rats consisted of (i) a mixture of untreated and sham-immunized groups (immunized with IFA and PBS), and (ii) a positive group immunized with killed bacteria of the homologous NTHI strain. Rats received an IT boost on day 14, post-IPP immunization. OMP26-immunized rats received an IT boost of 10 μg of OMP26. The non-immune group received 50 μl PBS, while the killed bacteria-immunized group received 50 μl of killed bacteria (bacteria count of 10¹⁰ per ml). Animals were challenged for 4 hours with live bacteria (bacteria count 5×10⁸) 21 days after the first immunization. A heterologous strain, NTHI-II, was also used for bacterial challenge. Bacteria were grown overnight at 37° C. in 5% CO₂ on brain heart infusion agar plates supplemented with 50 ml defibrinated horse blood per litre of agar, recovered, washed and resuspended in PBS to the required concentration. Bacteria were introduced into the lungs via an intra-tracheal cannula and 4 hours later the rats were euthanized. Blood was collected and aliquots of serum stored at −20° C. for antibody analysis. Lungs were lavaged by flushing with 5×2 ml of PBS, and the pooled lavage (BAL) assessed for bacteria numbers. Following lung lavage, the lungs were removed, homogenised and assessed for numbers of bacteria. Cytospin slides were prepared for determination of differential cell counts in the lung lavage. Total cell numbers present in the lung lavage were calculated by staining with methylene blue and counting using a haemocytometer.

Results

Rats immunized with OMP26 and challenged with live bacteria of the NTHI-I homologous strain on day 21 showed significant bacterial clearance (P<0.005). Rats immunized and boosted with 10 μg OMP26 had 92% fewer bacteria in the lung than the non-immune group after 4 h, whereas rats receiving 40 μg OMP26 in the IPP immunization, and boosted with 10 μg OMP26, had 96% fewer bacteria and were equivalent to the 95% clearance observed for killed bacteria immunized rats (FIG. 4).

Rats immunized with OMP26 were also challenged with live bacteria from a heterologous nontypeable strain, NTHI-II. The results in Table 1 show that OMP26 immunization also significantly (P<0.005) cleared bacteria in a pulmonary challenge by a different strain. The immunized group had 93% fewer bacteria than the non-immune group in the BAL after 4 h, demonstrating a rate of bacterial clearance comparable to that for homologous challenge. OMP26 immunization also reduced the numbers of bacteria present in the lung homogenates of the immunized groups compared with the non-immune groups. The lung homogenates from the rats challenged with NTHI-II (heterologous strain) had significantly less bacteria than the non-immune lungs. However, the magnitude of the difference was 80% in the lungs, with 93% clearance in the BAL as compared with 89% clearance in the lungs, and 87% clearance in the BAL for groups challenged with NTHI-I (the homologous strain). The percentage clearance in this experiment for NTHI-I differed from previous experiments due to the live bacterial inoculum containing considerably more bacteria than usual (usual inoculum ranged between 0.6 and 1.4×10¹⁰ CFU per ml).

Greater numbers of phagocytic cells were present in the BAL of OMP26-immunized animals, and correlated with the enhanced bacterial clearance in these animals (Table 2). The increase in cell recruitment in immunized groups was the same for both homologous and non-homologous bacterial challenge. However, at 4 h post-challenge, the differential cell counts were not significantly different between immune and non-immune groups (Table 2), with both groups showing similar ratios of PMNs to macrophage:

TABLE 1 Pulmonary clearance following OMP-26 immunization with challenge by homologous and heterologous non-typeable H. influenzae bacteria. H. influenzae recovered 4 h post-challenge (log₁₀CFU)^(a) (% clearance) Challenge strain of H. influenzae ^(b) Rat group^(c) NTHI-I (homologous) NTHI-II (heterologous) Non-immune BAL 7.01 ± 0.11 6.28 ± 0.07 Lung 7.76 ± 0.05 6.69 ± 0.05 OMP26- immunized BAL 6.15 ± 0.15 (87%)* 5.15 ± 0.16 (93%)* Lung 6.81 ± 0.17 (89%)* 6.01 ± 0.19 (80%)* ^(a)Values represent mean ± SEM in either the BAL or lung homogeneic for rats challenged for 4 h with live bacteria from either NTHI-I or NTHI-II strains on day 21 post-PP immunisation with 10 μg OMP26. All rats received an IT-boost (10 μg) on day 14. Non-immune rats were a combination of sham-treated and untreated animals. ^(b)Concentration of live bacterial in challenge inoculum (as determined by plating of serial dilutions) was 10.38 (log₁₀) CFU per ml for NTHI-I and 10.17 (log₁₀) CFU per ml for NTHI-II. ^(c)n = 4 per group for challenge with NTHI-I  n = 4 for non-immune and n = 6 for OMP26-immunized groups for challenge with NTHI-II P < 0.001 compared to non-immune group.

TABLE 2 Phagocytic cell counts in the BAL 4 h post-pulmonary challenge with five non-typeable H. influenzae. Challenged Challenged with with Differential cell count NTHI-I NTHI-II from cytospin slide (homologous) (heterologous) preparation of BAL (%) Total number of cells in BAL Macro- Rat group (× 10⁶) PMNs phages Others Non-immune 15.9 ± 1.1  17.5 ± 3.0  95.8 2.2 2 OMP26- 26.1 ± 1.1^(n) 28.2 ± 1.6^(n) 95 2.7 2.1 im- munized ^(n)P < 0.001 compared to non-immune group.

(iv) OMPS26-specific ELISA

Polysorb microtiter wells were coated with purified OMP26 at a concentration of 1 μg per ml for assay of IgG, IgG_(2a), IgA, and IgM; and 10 μg per ml for IgG₁, IgG_(2b), OgG_(2c) and IgE. The plates were washed five times in PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 between incubation steps. The wells were blocked with 5% skim milk in PBS-0.05% Tween 20 for 60 min. Wells were incubated for 90 min with serum (1/25 to 1/3200), or BAL (1/2 to 1/16) samples were serially diluted in blocking buffer for analysis. Conjugated immunoglobulin used were goat anti-rat IgG (1/2000), IgA (1/1000), and IgM (1/4000) (Fc specific); mouse anti-rat IgG₁ (1/500), IgG_(2a) (1/1000), IgG_(2b) (1/500), and IgG_(2c) (1/500), and wells were incubated with conjugated immunoglobulin for 90 min. The plates were then developed.

Results

Antibody specific to OPM26 was measured in the serum and BAL samples of rats immunized with OMP26, as well as from rats that had been immunized with killed bacteria from four different strains of H. influenzae. High OMP26-specific antibody titers for IgG, IgA and IgM were found in the serum, and IgG and IgA in the BAL of rats immunized with OMP26, with the highest levels observed for the group receiving the higher immunization dosage of 40 μg (Table 3). Detectable levels of OMP26-specific IgG, IgA and IgM in the serum, and IgG and IgA in the BAL, were also found in rats that had been immunized with different strains of H. influenzae (Table 3), although the levels observed for these groups were significantly less than those in the OMP26-immunized groups. IgE ELISAs were also carried out on serum from OMP26 rat groups, however, levels of OMP26-specific IgE could not be detected (data not shown).

Measurement of OMP26-specific IgG subclasses found that OMP26-specific IgG₁ was only detectable following the 40 μg immunization, whereas significant levels of IgG_(2a) and IgG_(2b) subclasses were found for both 10 μg and 40 μg OMP26 immunization groups (FIG. 5). Levels of both IgG_(2a) and IgG_(2b) increased significantly (P<0.05) with the increase in concentration of OMP26 from 10 μg to 40 μg in the IPP inoculum. IgG_(2c) was also measured, however, significant levels of OMP26-specific antibody from this subclass could not be detected (data not shown).

TABLE 3 Comparison of OMP26-specific antibodies in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage following immunization with either OMP26 or killed bacteria from H. influenzae. Antibody to OMP26 (ELISA titer^(a)). Serum Bronchoalveolar Lavage Group^(b) n IgG IgA IgM IgG IgA IgM non-immune 7 n.d.^(d) n.d. 10.5 ± n.d. n.d. n.d. 1.6 10 μg 5 1209 ± 939 ± 30.5 ± 4.3 ± 6.1 ± n.d. OMP26 255* 161* 4* 1.0* 1.9* 40 μg 5 2806 ± 2440 ± 142.5 ± 8.3 ± 29.1 ± n.d. OMP26 405* 410* 30.6* 1.9* 7.9* NTHI-I^(c) 4 58 ± 37 ± 39.1 ± 0.5 ± 1.2 ± n.d. 17* 4* 0.8* 0.1 0.5 n.d. NTHI-II^(c) 4 22 ± 26 ± 39.3 ± 0.6 ± 0.4 ± n.d. 4* 5* 5.0* 0.1 0.1 HI-CD^(c) 4 18 ± 20 ± 42.2 ± 0.6 ± 0.8 ± n.d. 1* 1* 3.1* 0.1 0.3 Hib-II^(c) 4 27 ± 38 ± 34.4 ± 0.6 ± 1.6 ± n.d. 4* 3* 2.3* 0.1 0.4 ^(a)Antibody titers calculated as described in the materials and methods. ^(b)Rats were immunized via PP on day 0, received an IT boost on day 14 and were challenged with live bacteria on day 21. Serum and BAL samples were prepared as described in the materials and methods. ^(c)Rats were immunized with killed bacteria from the strain of H. influenzae indicated and had received a live challenge with bacteria from the homologous strain. ^(d)n.d. indicates that OMP-26 specific antibody could not be detected at the lowest sample dilution. *P < 0.05 compared to non-immune group.

(v) Immunoblot

Proteins separated by SDS-PAGE were electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose (0.2 μm pore size). Rat serum from OMP26, NTHI-I, NTHI-II, as well as strains HI-CD, and Hib-II-immunized groups was diluted 10-fold in TTBS-5% (w/v) skim milk powder and was used as the primary antibody. A 500-fold dilution of horseradish peroxidase conjugated goat anti-rat IgG (Fc specific) in TTBS-5% skim milk was used as the second antibody.

Results

Immunoblot analysis of recognition of OMP26 by antibodies present in the serum of non-immune, OMP26-immunized and H. influenzae—(four strains) immunized rats has shown recognition of this protein by antibodies present in the serum from each of the immunized groups, but not the non-immune group (FIG. 6). This demonstrates the cross-reactivity of antibody-responses generated by immunization with the H. influenzae strains used in this study with the OMP26 purified from the NTHI-I strain.

(vi) Antigen-specific Lymphocyte Assay

Lymphocytes obtained from the mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) were cultured at a concentration of 10⁶ cells per ml. The antigen (OMP26) was suspended in culture medium in a 10-fold dilution series and sterile filtered. The cell suspension and antigen were added in triplicate to flat-bottomed multiwell plates to give a final volume of 0.2 ml per well. Lymphocyte proliferation was estimated by [³H] thymidine incorporation for the last 8 h of a 4-day culture. Results were calculated by subtraction of background from the geometric means of triplicate wells, then the geometric mean +/− standard error of the entire treatment group.

Results

Lymphocytes from the MLN of OMP26-immunized and non-immunized rats were assessed for antigen-specific proliferative responses. Cells from the OMP26-immunized group responded significantly to OMP26 in culture in vitro, whereas cells from the non-immunized rats did not show significant proliferation (FIG. 7A). The lymphocytes from rats immunized with OMP26 were also cultured with OMP extracts from four H. influenzae strains to assess cross-reactive responses. Significant proliferative responses were found in the lymphocytes from the OMP26-immunized group for the OMP extracts from strains NTHI-I, NTHI-II and HI-CD, but no significant proliferation was observed for the extract from the Hib-II strain (FIGS. 7B-E).

EXAMPLE 2

Cloning and Sequencing of OMP26

DNA was extracted from NTHi. The region of DNA encoding OMP26 was identified and amplified by standard PCR methods using primers designed to recognise the gene (synthesised at Biomolecular Resource Facility, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Canberra, ACT, Australia). After analysis to determine successful recognition of the correct product, the PCR DNA product was extracted.

Two plasmids were prepared. One DNA product contained the region encoding both the signal peptide and the mature OMP26 product and the second encoded the final mature OMP26 (without the leader signal peptide). The PCR DNA products were digested with the endonucleases Hindiii for OMP26 plus signal peptide and NspBII plus HindIII for mature OMP26. The digested DNA was recovered and ligated at the SmaI and HindIII sites into the plasmids pQE30 or pQE31 (Giagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) for OMP26 plus signal peptide or OMP26 mature protein respectively. The plasmids were then purified and precipitated. Sequencing was performed by the dye deoxy-terminator procedure at the biomolecular resource Facility, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Canberra, Australia.

Results

The sequence shown in FIG. 1 represents both the mature OMP26 plus the signal peptide. The signal peptide sequence encompasses the first twenty-three amino acids. The final product expressed by NTHi on the outer membrane commences at amino acid twenty-four.

5 601 base pairs nucleic acid single linear cDNA Haemophilus influenzae CDS 1..594 1 ATG AAA AAC ATC GCA AAA GTA ACC GCA CTT GCT TTA GGT ATT GCA CTT 48 Met Lys Asn Ile Ala Lys Val Thr Ala Leu Ala Leu Gly Ile Ala Leu 1 5 10 15 GCT TCA GGC TAT GCT TCC GCT GAA GAA AAA ATT GCT TTC ATT AAT GCA 96 Ala Ser Gly Tyr Ala Ser Ala Glu Glu Lys Ile Ala Phe Ile Asn Ala 20 25 30 GGT TAT ATT TTT CAA CAT CAC CCA GAT CGC CAA GCG GTA GCA GAT AAA 144 Gly Tyr Ile Phe Gln His His Pro Asp Arg Gln Ala Val Ala Asp Lys 35 40 45 CTT GAT GCT GAA TTT AAA CCT GTA GCT GAG AAA TTA GCA GCA AGC AAA 192 Leu Asp Ala Glu Phe Lys Pro Val Ala Glu Lys Leu Ala Ala Ser Lys 50 55 60 AAA GAA GTT GAT GAT AAA ATT GCT GCT GCT CGT AAA AAA GTA GAA GCA 240 Lys Glu Val Asp Asp Lys Ile Ala Ala Ala Arg Lys Lys Val Glu Ala 65 70 75 80 AAA GTT GCG GCT TTA GAA AAA GAT GCA CCT CGC TTA CGT CAA GCT GAT 288 Lys Val Ala Ala Leu Glu Lys Asp Ala Pro Arg Leu Arg Gln Ala Asp 85 90 95 ATT CAA AAA CGC CAA GAA GAA ATT AAT AAA TTA GGT GCG GCT GAA GAT 336 Ile Gln Lys Arg Gln Glu Glu Ile Asn Lys Leu Gly Ala Ala Glu Asp 100 105 110 GCT GAA TTA CAA AAA TTA ATG CAA GAA CAA GAT AAA AAA GTT CAA GAA 384 Ala Glu Leu Gln Lys Leu Met Gln Glu Gln Asp Lys Lys Val Gln Glu 115 120 125 TTC CAA GCT CAA AAT GAA AAA CGT CAA GCT GAA GAA CGT GGT AAA TTA 432 Phe Gln Ala Gln Asn Glu Lys Arg Gln Ala Glu Glu Arg Gly Lys Leu 130 135 140 TTA GAT AGC ATT CAA ACT GCG ACA AAT AAT TTA GCA AGA GCA AAA GGT 480 Leu Asp Ser Ile Gln Thr Ala Thr Asn Asn Leu Ala Arg Ala Lys Gly 145 150 155 160 TAT ACT TAT GTG CTT GAT GCA AAT TCA GTT GTA TTT GCG GTA GAG GGT 528 Tyr Thr Tyr Val Leu Asp Ala Asn Ser Val Val Phe Ala Val Glu Gly 165 170 175 AAA GAT ATT ACT GAA GAA GTA TTA AAA TCT ATC CCT GCT TCT GAA AAA 576 Lys Asp Ile Thr Glu Glu Val Leu Lys Ser Ile Pro Ala Ser Glu Lys 180 185 190 GCA CAA GAG AAA AAA TAA TAGGTTC 601 Ala Gln Glu Lys Lys 195 197 amino acids amino acid linear protein not provided 2 Met Lys Asn Ile Ala Lys Val Thr Ala Leu Ala Leu Gly Ile Ala Leu 1 5 10 15 Ala Ser Gly Tyr Ala Ser Ala Glu Glu Lys Ile Ala Phe Ile Asn Ala 20 25 30 Gly Tyr Ile Phe Gln His His Pro Asp Arg Gln Ala Val Ala Asp Lys 35 40 45 Leu Asp Ala Glu Phe Lys Pro Val Ala Glu Lys Leu Ala Ala Ser Lys 50 55 60 Lys Glu Val Asp Asp Lys Ile Ala Ala Ala Arg Lys Lys Val Glu Ala 65 70 75 80 Lys Val Ala Ala Leu Glu Lys Asp Ala Pro Arg Leu Arg Gln Ala Asp 85 90 95 Ile Gln Lys Arg Gln Glu Glu Ile Asn Lys Leu Gly Ala Ala Glu Asp 100 105 110 Ala Glu Leu Gln Lys Leu Met Gln Glu Gln Asp Lys Lys Val Gln Glu 115 120 125 Phe Gln Ala Gln Asn Glu Lys Arg Gln Ala Glu Glu Arg Gly Lys Leu 130 135 140 Leu Asp Ser Ile Gln Thr Ala Thr Asn Asn Leu Ala Arg Ala Lys Gly 145 150 155 160 Tyr Thr Tyr Val Leu Asp Ala Asn Ser Val Val Phe Ala Val Glu Gly 165 170 175 Lys Asp Ile Thr Glu Glu Val Leu Lys Ser Ile Pro Ala Ser Glu Lys 180 185 190 Ala Gln Glu Lys Lys 195 22 amino acids amino acid single linear peptide N-terminal Haemophilus influenzae 3 Glu Glu Lys Ile Ala Phe Ile Asn Ala Gly Tyr Ile Phe Gln His His 1 5 10 15 Pro Asp Arg Ala Val Lys 20 29 amino acids amino acid single linear protein not provided 4 Ala Met Ala Thr Glu Asn Ile Ala Phe Ile Ser Gly Asp Tyr Leu Phe 1 5 10 15 Gln Asn His Pro Asp Arg Lys Met Val Ala Glu Lys Leu 20 25 26 amino acids amino acid single linear protein not provided 5 Ala Gly Lys Ile Ala Ile Val Asn Val Ser Ser Ile Phe Gln Gln Leu 1 5 10 15 Pro Ala Arg Glu Ala Val Ala Lys Gln Leu 20 25 

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for the diagnosis of H. influenzae infection, comprising the step of contacting a sample from a subject with an isolated protein which (i) is an outer membrane protein of H. influenzae or an immunogenic fragment thereof, and (ii) comprises the amino acid sequence as set forth in SEQ ID No. 2, an immunogenic fragment of said sequence, a sequence at least 90 identical to the amino acid sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO. 2 and having an immunogenic epitope of said sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2, or an immunogenic fragment of a sequence at least 90% identical to the amino acid sequence as set forth in SEQ ID No. 2 and having an immunogenic epitope of said sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2, and detecting a specific binding interaction with antibody in said sample, in which said interaction indicates the presence of H. influenzae.
 2. A method for the diagnosis of H. influenzea infection, comprising the step of contacting a sample from a subject with an isolated protein which (i) is an outer membrane protein of H. influenzae or an immunogenic fragment thereof, and (ii) comprises the amino acid sequence as set forth in SEQ ID No. 2 commencing with amino acid twenty-four as the N-terminal amino acid, an immunogenic fragment of said sequence, a sequence at least 90% identical to the amino acid sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO. 2 commencing with amino acid twenty-four as the N-terminal amino acid and having an immunogenic epitope of said sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2 commencing with amino acid twenty-four or an immunogenic fragment of a sequence at least 90% identical to the amino acid sequence as set forth in SEQ ID No. 2 commencing with amino acid twenty-four as the N-terminal amino acid and having an immunogenic epitope of said sequences of SEQ ID NO: 2 commencing with amino acid twenty-four, and detecting a specific binding interaction with antibody in said sample, in which said interaction indicates the presence of H influenzae.
 3. A method according to claim 1, wherein the isolated protein, or immunogenic fragment thereof, forms part of a fusion protein and the detection is to a specific binding interaction with the portion of the fusion protein that comprises an immunogenic epitope of SEQ ID NO:
 2. 4. A method according to claim 2, wherein the isolated protein, or immunogenic fragment thereof, forms part of a fusion protein and the detection is to a specific binding interaction with the portion of the fusion protein that comprises an immunogenic epitope of SEQ ID NO:
 2. 5. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the isolated protein or immunogenic fragment thereof comprises an amino acid sequence at least 95% identical to the amino acid sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO. 2 and having an immunogenic epitope of said sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2 or an immunogenic fragment of a sequence at least 95% identical to the amino acid sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO. 2 and having an immunogenic epitope of said sequence of SEQ ID NO:
 2. 6. The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the isolated protein or immunogenic fragment thereof comprises an amino acid sequence at least 95% identical to the amino acid sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO. 2 commencing with amino acid twenty-four as the N-terminal amino acid and having an immunogenic epitope of said sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2 commencing with amino acid twenty-four or an immunogenic fragment of a sequence at least 95% identical to the amino acid sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO. 2 commencing with amino acid twenty-four as the N-terminal amino acid and having an immunogenic epitope of said sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2 commencing with amino acid twenty-four.
 7. A method for the diagnosis of H. influenzea infection, comprising the step of contacting a sample from a subject with an isolated protein which is an outer membrane protein of Haemophilus influenzae and comprises the amino acid sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO. 2 or an immunogenic fragment of said sequence, and detecting a specific binding interaction with antibody in said sample, in which said interaction indicates the presence of H. influenzae.
 8. A method as claimed in claim 7, wherein the isolated protein comprises the amino acid sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO.
 2. 9. A method as claimed in claim 8, wherein the isolated protein comprises the amino acid sequences as set forth in SEQ ID NO. 2 commencing with amino acid twenty-four as the N-terminal amino acid.
 10. A method as claimed in claim 7, wherein the isolated protein comprises an immunogenic fragment of the amino acid sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO.
 2. 